Effect of endovascular closure of the patent foramen ovale on the severity of symptoms of migraine with aura: a clinical study
https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2024-4-74-81
Abstract
Aim. To study the effect of endovascular closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) on the severity of symptoms of migraine attacks in patients with migraine with a history of aura.
Materials and Methods. We analyzed the data of 74 patients with migraine with a history of aura who underwent endovascular closure of the PFO for the period from 2018 to 2022 at the E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology. All patients underwent examinations that complied with clinical recommendations. The presence of a history of migraine with aura was determined through a patient interview, previous hospital history, and was confirmed by a neurologist. The severity of migraine symptoms was assessed using the MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) scale before occluder implantation and after 36,9 [22,7; 50,8] months the intervention as part of a telephone contact.
Results. 49 patients before the intervention had pain syndrome assessed on the MIDAS scale <11 points, in 25 patients the MIDAS score was ≥11 points. The technical success of the intervention was 100%. In the long–term period, the average MIDAS score in the group of patients with baseline MIDAS <11 was 0.00 [0.00; 5.00] points, and in the group with baseline MIDAS ≥11 was 15.00 [14.00; 15.00] points (p<0,0001). After 36,9 [22,7; 50,8] months occluder implantation, the average MIDAS score decreased by 75.0% in both groups (p<0,0001). The number of patients in the group with an initial MIDAS ≥11 points decreased by 80.0% compared to baseline values (p<0,0001).
Conclusion. Endovascular closure of the PFO in patients with migraine with a history of aura promotes significant regression of the pain syndrome.
About the Authors
A. S. TereshchenkoRussian Federation
Andrey S. Tereshchenko, Cand. of Sc. (Med.), Senior Researcher, the Department of Endovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Methods
15a Akademika Chazovа st., Moscow 121552
E. V. Merkulov
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Merkulov, Dr. of Sc. (Med.), Chief Researcher, the Department of Endovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Methods
15a Akademika Chazovа st., Moscow 121552
M. R. Azimova
Russian Federation
Makka R. Azimova, cardiologist of the 5th Cardiological Department
15a Akademika Chazovа st., Moscow 121552
O. A. Sivakova
Russian Federation
Olga A. Sivakova, Cand. of Sc. (Med.), Head of the 5th Cardiology Department
15a Akademika Chazovа st., Moscow 121552
References
1. Frolova E.S., Mikusev B.G. The relationship of patent foramen ovale and migraine. Molodezh', nauka, meditsina: materialy 68-i Vserossiiskoi mezhvuzovskoi studencheskoi nauchnoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem; 2022 Apr 20–21; Tver: Tver State Medical University, 2022. P. 786-788 (In Russ.).
2. Turakulova D.O. The role of the clinical interview in the diagnosis of tension headache. CARJIS 2022; 2(3):3-5. (In Russ.).
3. Wahl A., Praz F., Tai T. et al. Improvement of migraine headaches after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism. Heart. 2010;96(12):967-973. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.181156
4. Stewart W.F., Roy J., Lipton R.B. Migraine prevalence, socioeconomic status, and social causation. Neurology. 2013;81(11):948- 955. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a43b32
5. Alpert J.S. Strange Bedfellows: Migraine Headache and Patent Foramen Ovale. The American Journal of Medicine. 2021;134(11): 1307-1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.04.002
6. Rudoi A.S., Bova A.A., Nekhaichik T.A. Open oval window and associated clinical conditions. Clinical Medicine. 2017;95(7):607-612. (In Russ.) https://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0023-2149-2017-95-7-607-612
7. Rayhill M., Burch R. PFO and migraine: is there a role for closure? Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2017;17:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0730-5
8. Anzola G.P., Magoni M., Guindani M. et al. Potential source of cerebral embolism in migraine with aura: a transcranial Doppler study. Neurology. 1999;52(8):1622-1622. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.52.8.1622
9. Takagi H., Umemoto T. A meta-analysis of case-control studies of the association of migraine and patent foramen ovale. Journal of cardiology. 2016;67(6):493-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.09.016
10. Wilmshurst P.T., Pearson M.J., Nightingale S. et al. Inheritance of persistent foramen ovale and atrial septal defects and the relation to familial migraine with aura. Heart. 2004;90(11):1315-1320. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.025700
11. Hildick-Smith D., Williams T. M. Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine Headache. Interventional cardiology clinics. 2017;6(4):539-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccl.2017.05.006
12. Sharma A., Gheewala N., Silver P. Role of patent foramen ovale in migraine etiology and treatment: a review. Echocardiography. 2011;28(8):913-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01460.x
13. Lip P. Z. Y., Lip G. Y. H. Patent foramen ovale and migraine attacks: a systematic review. The American journal of medicine. 2014;127(5): 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.006
14. Nozari A., Dilekoz E., Sukhotinsky I., et al. Microemboli may link spreading depression, migraine aura, and patent foramen ovale. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society. 2010;67(2):221-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21871
15. Sharma A., Gheewala N., Silver P. Role of patent foramen ovale in migraine etiology and treatment: a review. Echocardiography. 2011; 28(8):913-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01460.x
16. Bokeriya L.A., Arkhipov A.N., Bolotova E.V., еt аl. Clinical guidelines for the management of adult patients with congenital heart defects. M.: A.N. Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 2010. P. 358. (in Russ.) ISBN 978-5-7982-0258-4.
17. Wilmshurst P.T., Nightingale S., Walsh K.P., et al. Effect on migraine of closure of cardiac right-to-left shunts to prevent recurrence of decompression illness or stroke or for haemodynamic reasons. The Lancet. 2000;356(9242):1648-1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03160-3
18. Tobis J.M., Charles A., Silberstein S.D. et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with migraine: the PREMIUM trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;70(22):2766-2774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1105
19. Kimmelstiel C., Gange C., Thaler D. Is patent foramen ovale closure effective in reducing migraine symptoms? A controlled study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2007;69(5):740-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21025
20. Rigatelli G., Dell’Avvocata F., Cardaioli P., et al. Improving migraine by means of primary transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure: long-term follow-up. American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease. 2012;2(2):89-95.
Review
For citations:
Tereshchenko A.S., Merkulov E.V., Azimova M.R., Sivakova O.A. Effect of endovascular closure of the patent foramen ovale on the severity of symptoms of migraine with aura: a clinical study. Eurasian heart journal. 2024;(4):74-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2024-4-74-81