THE ROLE OF INFLAMMATORY REACTIONS AND HEMORHEOLOGICAL INDICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH RESTENOSIS AFTER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, OPTIMIZATION OF TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2018-4-80-87
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of the trial was to study the importance of immuno-inflammatory processes and hemo-rheological changes in patients suffering from stable coronary heart disease after coronary angioplasty and stenting, as well as establishing the clinical effect of treatment optimized with anti-inflammatory drugs and immune-correctors.
Material and methods. The study included 103 patients in total and 64 patients with an implanted stent. Within 2-28 months after stent implantation, an angiographic study was performed with the definition of a coagulogram, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and pro-inflammatory cytokines - tumor necrosis factor (FNA-α), interleukins (IL), IL-6, IL-8 in the serum of patients with coronary artery disease.
Results. After coronary angioplasty and stenting in patients with coronary artery disease, the average concentrations of CRP and cytokines were significantly higher compared with both the control group and the group without restenosis. This indicator in the groups with and without restenosis was 16.4±1.2 (intragroup variation 6-36) mg/L and 6.8±0.4 (intragroup variation 5-10) mg/L, respectively; p<0.001. And from cytokines, the concentration of IL-6 in groups with and without restenosis was respectively 3.5+0.2 and 18.7+3.1 (p<0.01). In the correlative analysis in the group with restenosis, the expected close relationship between TNF-alpha and IL-6 is equal to r = 0.707, p<0.01, between CRB and IL-6, equal to r = 0.575, p<0.01, and between TNF-alpha and IL-8, equal to r = 0.610, p<0.05.
About the Author
N. A. PanahovaAzerbaijan
The department of clinical pharmacology,
Baku, Azerbaijan
+99412564-69-78
References
1. Schwartz R., Huber K., Murphy J. et al. Restenosis and proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19(2):267-274.
2. Schwartz R., Murphy J., Edwards W. et al. Restenosis after balloon angioplasty: a practical proliferative model in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 1990;82(6):2190-2200.
3. Serruys P., Kay I., Disco С et al. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six month: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT. II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coronaries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34(4):10671074.
4. Fischman D., Leon M., Bairn D, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease: Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med 1994;331(8):496-501.
5. Kinlay S., Schwartz G.G., Olson A.G., et al. for the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study Investigators. Circulation. 2003;Vol. l08(13):1560-1566.
6. Murphy J. A monk's prayer: 0 Lord what is the answer to instent restenosis? Eur. Heart J 2001;22(20): 1847-1849.
7. HokimotoS, Ogawa H, Saito T, et al. Increased plasma antigen levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in patients with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Jpn. Circ. J.2000;64:831-834.
8. Kornowski R, Hong MK, Tio FO, Bramwell O, Wu H, Leon MB. In-Stent reestenosis: contribution of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:224-30.
9. Sousa J., Costa M., Abizaid A. et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2001; 103(2):192-195.
Review
For citations:
Panahova N.A. THE ROLE OF INFLAMMATORY REACTIONS AND HEMORHEOLOGICAL INDICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH RESTENOSIS AFTER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, OPTIMIZATION OF TREATMENT. Eurasian heart journal. 2018;(4):80-87. https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2018-4-80-87