Assessment of the sensitivity of diagnostic methods in detecting hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses

Objective. Assessment of renal artery stenosis significance in patients with resistant arterial hypertension using non-invasive diagnostic methods and to compare them with the results of selective angiography and methods of physiological assessment of renal artery stenoses.

Materials and methods. Prospectively, 156 patients with drug-resistant arterial hypertension and signs of renal artery stenosis detected by doppler ultrasonography of renal arteries were included in the study. Subsequently, 25 patients were excluded from the study due to multiple variant renal blood supply and bilateral renal artery stenosis. The remaining patients (n=131) underwent selective angiography of renal arteries, and 66 of them additionally underwent CTA of renal arteries with intravenous contrast. If the artery narrowing was 90% or more (n=27) in diameter, the stenosis was considered hemodynamically significant and further stenting of the affected artery was performed, and in case of 60-90% stenosis (n=52) additional assessment of functional significance of the stenosis was performed by measuring translesional pressure gradient, fractional blood flow reserve, instantaneous blood flow reserve (iFR) and Pd/ Pa ratio. 

Results. Among all patients (n=131), in whom the doppler ultrasonography of renal arteries showed signs of unilateral renal artery stenosis, after angiography combined with additional methods of functional significance assessment, hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis was confirmed in 41% of cases (n=54). Thus, the sensitivity of doppler ultrasonography of renal arteries in detection of hemodynamically significant stenoses was 74%, prognostic value of positive 78% and negative result 64% (p<0,001). According to CTA (n=66) renal artery stenosis was confirmed in 56 patients. The results of CTA of renal arteries in 88% of cases coincided with the results of selective angiography, and using additional functional methods hemodynamically significant stenosis was confirmed in 32 (48%) patients. The sensitivity of CTA in detection of hemodynamically significant stenoses of renal arteries was 69%, specificity 91%, prognostic value of positive and negative results was 91 and 68% respectively. According to selective angiography, out of 131 patients, 24 patients had no renal artery stenosis, 28 patients had stenosis <60%, 27 patients had renal artery stenosis >90% and 52 patients had stenosis 60-90%. Patients with stenosis <60% were not considered candidates for renal artery stenting.

1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 populationrepresentative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-980. Epub 2021 Aug 24. Erratum in: Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):520. PMID: 34450083; PMCID: PMC8446938. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01330-1

2. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021 3104. PMID: 3016551. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

3. Benjamin MM, Fazel P, Filardo G, Choi JW, Stoler RC. Prevalence of and risk factors of renal artery stenosis in patients with resistant hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113:687-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.046

4. Dobrek L. An Outline of Renal Artery Stenosis Pathophysiology-A Narrative Review. Life (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;11(3):208. PMID: 33799957. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030208

5. Aboyans V, Ricco J-B, Bartelink M-L, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):763-816. PMID: 28886620. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095

6. Shchelkova G.V., Danilov N.M., Erkenova A.M., Yarovoy S.Yu., Matchin Yu.G., Mironova O.I., Bobkova I.N., Shvetsov M.Yu., Kislyak O.A., Chazova I.E. Consensus on renovascular hypertension: diagnosis and treatment. Systemic Hypertension. 2023;20(2):5-20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38109/2075-082X-2023-2-5-20]

7. Bax L, Woittiez AJ, Kouwenberg HJ, et al. Stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:840–848 W150-1. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00119

8. Investigators A, Wheatley K, Ives N, et al. Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1953-1962. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0905368

9. Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, et al. Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1310753

10. Arab, Sadiq F.1; Alhumaid, Ahmed A.2, 3,; Abu Alnasr, Mahmoud Tawfiq4; Altuwaijri, Talal A.2; Al-Ghofili, Hesham2; Al-Salman, Mussaad M.2; Altoijry, Abdulmajeed2. Review of Renal Artery Stenosis and Hypertension: Diagnosis, Management, and Recent Randomized Control Trials. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2022 Jan-Feb;33(1):147-159. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.367807

11. Protasiewicz, M., Kądziela, J., Początek, K., Poręba, R., Podgórski, M., Derkacz, A., Witkowski, A. (2013). Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients With Resistant Hypertension. The American Journal of Cardiology, 112(9), 1417–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.06.030

12. Fananapazir G., McGahan J. P., Corwin M. T., Stewart S. L., Vu C. T., Wright L., Troppmann C. Screening for Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis: Ultrasound-Based Stenosis Probability Stratification. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2017 Nov;209(5):1064-1073. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.17913

13. Tafur-Soto JD, White CJ. Renal artery stenosis. Cardiol Clin. 2015 Feb;33(1):59-73. PMID: 25439331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2014.09.006

14. AbuRahma, A. F., & Yacoub, M. Renal imaging: duplex ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and angiography. Seminars in Vascular Surgery. 2013 Dec;26(4):134-43.https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2014.06.001

15. Hillman BJ. Imaging advances in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Jul;153(1):5-14. PMID: 2660537.

16. Protasiewicz M, Poczatek K, Poreba R, et al. Comparison of the renal hyperemic effects of papaverine and dopamine in patients with renal artery stenosis. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens 2015; 9:9–14. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.153.1.5

17. Van Brussel P. M., van de Hoef T. P., de Winter R. J., Vogt L., & van den Born B.-J. (2017). Hemodynamic Measurements for the Selection of Patients With Renal Artery Stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017 May 22;10(10):973-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.046