Preview

Eurasian heart journal

Advanced search

Evidence born from ASCOT trial – still important after 15 years

https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2021-3-46-53

Abstract

The paper presents the overview evolution of hypertension identification and treatment during last 15 years after publication of ASCOT trial (AngloScandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial) results. It discusses possible mechanism of more significant cardiovascular risk reduction in amlodipine/ perindopril group comparing with atenolol/diuretic group: central blood pressure, arterial stiffness, asleep blood pressure and BP variability. Innovative approaches in time of ASCOТ trial such as combined antihypertensive therapy from start and RAAS inhibitor as first line now became routine practice in actual guidelines. Importance of early prescribing of fixed antihypertensive combination and choice of safe drugs help to improve adherence and decrease resistant hypertension prevalence. Prevention of new onset of diabetes in metabolic patients needs application of metabolically neutral drugs and including of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in combination therapy. Results of ASCOT-Legacy trial demonstrated long-term protective effect of amlodipine/perindopril combination resulting in decreasing mortality, rate of stroke and coronary events during 20-years follow-up.

About the Author

O. P. Rotar
Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Rotar Oxana Petrovna, MD, PhD, Chief Researcher of the Scientific Research Laboratory of Epidemiology of non-communicable diseases

2 Akkuratova street, Saint Petersburg 197341



References

1. Arterial hypertension in adults. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(3):3786. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3786

2. Dahlöf B., Sever P.S., Poulter N.R. et al. ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9489):895-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67185-1

3. Muromtseva G.A., Kontsevaya A.V., Konstantinov V.V. et al. on behalf of the ECVD-RF study. The prevalence of non-infectious diseases risk factors in Russian population in 2012-2013 years. The results of ECVD-RF. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(6):4–11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-6-4-11

4. Shalnova S.A., Deev A.D., Metelskaya V.A. et al. on behalf of ESSE-RF trial workgroup. Awareness and treatment specifics of statin therapy in persons with various cardiovasular risk: the study ESSE-RF. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2016;15(4):29–37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2016-4-29-37

5. Unger T., Borghi C., Charchar F. et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. J Hypertens. 2020;38(6):982-1004. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002453.

6. Thomopoulos C., Bazoukis G., Grassi G. et al. Monotherapy vs combination treatments of different complexity: a meta-analysis of blood pressure lowering randomized outcome trials. J Hypertens. 2021;39(5):846-855. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002759

7. Ostroumova O.D., Bondarets O.V. Born from ASCOT. System Hypertension. 2011;2(8):10-17. (In Russ.)

8. Weir M. Risk-based classification of hypertension and the role of combination therapy. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2008;10(1):4-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.08134.x

9. Savarese G., Costanzo P., Cleland J.G. et al. A meta-analysis reporting effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients without heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(2):131-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.011

10. Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC). 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Stable coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4076. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/29/1560-4071-2020-4076

11. Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC). 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4083. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4083

12. Brugts J.J., Arima H., Remme W. et al. The incidence and clinical predictors of ACE-inhibitor induced dry cough by perindopril in 27,492 patients with vascular disease. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176(3):718-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.108

13. Borghi C., Veronesi M. Cough and ACE Inhibitors: The Truth Beyond Placebo. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(3):550-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1040

14. Morozova T.E., Gontarenko S.V., Kuzmina E.R. Principles of ACE inhibitor choice. Special features of perindopril. Terapevticheskiy arkhiv. 2014;86(9):115-118 (in Russ)

15. Aronov D.M. Znachenie amlodipina (norvaska) v kardiologii. Cardiosomatics. 2014; 5(2):15–21. (in Russ)

16. Mancia G., De Backer G., Dominiczak A. et al. The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension, The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2007;28(12):1462-536. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm236

17. Mancia G., Fagard R., Narkiewicz K. et al. Task Force Members. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1281-357. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc

18. Williams B., Mancia G., Spiering W. et al. Authors/Task Force Members. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018;36(10):19532041. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940. Erratum in: J Hypertens. 2019;37(1):226. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940

19. Jamerson K., Weber M.A., Bakris G.L. et al; ACCOMPLISH Trial Investigators. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(23):2417-28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806182

20. Hernández R.H., Armas-Hernández M.J., Chourio J.A. et al. Comparative effects of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS during treatment and after missing two doses. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6(1):47-57. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126097-200102000-00008

21. Myers M.G. A dose-response study of perindopril in hypertension: effects on blood pressure 6 and 24 h after dosing. Perindopril Multicentre Dose-Response Study Group. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12(11):1191-6.

22. Hatala R, Pella D, Hatalová K, Šidlo R. Optimization of blood pressure treatment with fixed-combination perindopril/amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension. Clin Drug Investig. 2012;32(9):603-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261915, PMID: 22877321

23. Fogari R., Zoppi A., Mugellini A. et al. Effects of amlodipine, nifedipine GITS, and indomethacin on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorinduced cough: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, crossover study, Current Therapeutic Research. 1999;60 (3):121-128, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-393X(00)88520-3

24. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1625-1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00590-0

25. Bell K., Doust J., McGeechan K. et al. The potential for overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis because of blood pressure variability: a comparison of the 2017 ACC/AHA, 2018 ESC/ESH and 2019 NICE hypertension guidelines. J Hypertens. 2021;39(2):236-242. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002614

26. Yano Y., Ning H., Allen N. et al. Long-term blood pressure variability throughout young adulthood and cognitive function in midlife: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Hypertension. 2014;64(5):983-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03978

27. Webb A.J., Rothwell P.M. Effect of dose and combination of antihypertensives on interindividual blood pressure variability: a systematic review. Stroke. 2011;42(10):2860-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.611566

28. Rothwell P.M., Howard S.C., Dolan E. et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):895-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60308-X

29. Ostroumova O.D. Effect of a fixed-dose combination of perindopril arginine/amlodipine on the level and variability of blood pressure according to its office visit-to-visit measurements and self-measurements at home: A subanalysis of the PREVOSHODSTVO (SUPERIORITY) program. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. 2017;89(8):29-36. DOI: 10.17116/terarkh201789829-36. (In Russ.)]

30. Williams B., Lacy P.S., Thom S.M. et al. CAFE Investigators; AngloScandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Investigators; CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee. Differential impact of blood pressurelowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113(9):1213-25. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595496

31. Omboni S., Posokhov I., Parati G. et al. VASOTENS Registry Study Group. Ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness web-based telemonitoring in patients at cardiovascular risk. First results of the VASOTENS (Vascular health ASsessment Of The hypertENSive patients) Registry. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21(8):1155-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13623

32. McEniery CM. Antihypertensive drugs and central blood pressure. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2009;11(4):253-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-009-0043-4

33. Dolan E., Stanton A.V., Thom S. et al. ASCOT Investigators. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring predicts cardiovascular events in treated hypertensive patients--an Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial substudy. J Hypertens. 2009;27(4):876-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e328322cd62

34. Hermida R.C., Crespo J.J., Otero A. et al. Hygia Project Investigators. Asleep blood pressure: significant prognostic marker of vascular risk and therapeutic target for prevention. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(47):4159-4171. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy475

35. Hermida R.C., Crespo J.J., Domínguez-Sardiña M. et al. Hygia Project Investigators. Bedtime hypertension treatment improves cardiovascular risk reduction: the Hygia Chronotherapy Trial. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(48):4565-4576. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz754

36. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(20)30925-9

37. Cosentino F., Grant P.J., Aboyans V. et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):255-323. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486

38. Gupta A.K., Nasothimiou E.G., Chang C.L. et al. ASCOT investigators. Baseline predictors of resistant hypertension in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial (ASCOT): a risk score to identify those at high-risk. J Hypertens. 2011;29(10):2004-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834a8a42

39. Carey R.M., Calhoun D.A., Bakris G.L. et al. Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2018;72(5):e53-e90. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084

40. Parati G., Kjeldsen S., Coca A. et al. Adherence to Single-Pill Versus Free-Equivalent Combination Therapy in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2021;77(2):692-705. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15781

41. Gupta A., Whiteley W., Godec T. et al. The relationship between BP-control, BP-variability and antihypertensive treatment with the longterm risk of cardiovascular event: lessons from the ASCOT-LEGACY 20-year follow-up, Journal of Hypertension. 2021;39:p e148 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000745996.70900.76

42. Gupta A., Whiteley W., Godec T. et al. Long term benefits of blood pressure treatment on the incidence of atrial fibrillation, heart failure and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: 20-years follow-up of ASCOT-LEGACY, Journal of Hypertension. 2021;39:p e8 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000744436.51700.9f

43. Alekhin A.N., Dubinina E.A. Pandemic: the view of a clinical psychologist. Arterial’naya Gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2020;26(3):312-316. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-3-312-316

44. Korostovtseva L.S., Bochkarev M.V., Shumeyko A.A. et al. COVID 19: what are the risks for patients with sleep disorders? Arterial’naya Gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2020;26(4):466–482. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/1607


Review

For citations:


Rotar O.P. Evidence born from ASCOT trial – still important after 15 years. Eurasian heart journal. 2021;(3):46-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2021-3-46-53

Views: 529


ISSN 2225-1685 (Print)
ISSN 2305-0748 (Online)