Preview

Eurasian heart journal

Advanced search

THE ROLE OF SENSITIVE C-FIBERS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOPROTECTIVE EFFECT OF REMOTE ISCHAEMIC PRECONDITIONING

https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2012-1-6-13

Abstract

To evaluate the role of C-fibers in the development of cardioprotective effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RPc) during myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion. Materials and methods: experiments have been conducted on 80 anaesthetized Wistar male rats (250-350g weight), divided into two experimental protocols. Protocol 1. The protocol included 30 neonatal rats, which were divided into two groups. In the first group (n=15), capsaicin was injected to animals in neonatal period in order to degenerate sensitive C-fibers. When achieved 250g, the rats were subjected to 30 min myocardial ischaemia and 120 min reperfusion (Control-AMI, n=7, Capsaicin-AMI, n=6) or 15-min both femoral arteries occlusion 25 min before coronary artery occlusion (Control-RPc, n=8; Capsaicin-RPc, n=9). Protocol 2. The first group of animals (Control) was subjected to 30-min myocardial ischaemia with following 120-min reperfusion only. In the second and third animal group 15-min bilateral femoral arteries occlusion was performed 25 min before the onset (RPc group) or 25 min after the onset (RPc25' group) of ischaemia. The animals of the fourth and fifth groups capsaicin was injected subcutaneously 25 min before the onset and on the 25 min after the onset of ischaemia (Capsaicin and Capsaicin25'groups). Results: Protocol 1. Infarct size was comparable in Control-AMI and Capsaicin-AMI groups (45±4% and 43±1%) respectively. No infarct size reduction was observed in Capsaicin-RPc group compared to Capsaicin-AMI group (p>0,05). Protocol 2. Significant reduction in infarct size was observed in groups, where femoral arteries occlusion was performed 25 min before the onset and on the 25th min after the onset of ischaemia, as well as in those, where capsaicin was injected before myocardial ischaemia, comparing to control group (p<0,001). There was no infarct-size reduction if capsaicin was injected on the 25th min of ischaemia (p>0,05 vs. Control). Conclusions: the results suggest that activation of С-fiber afferents by topical application of capsaicin to the peripheral tissue prior to myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion limits myocardial injury, mimicking the effect of remote preconditioning, but it doesn't play a key role in the development of RPc applied 25 min after the onset of ischaemia.

About the Authors

V. Ch. Barsukevich
Республиканский научно-практический центр «Кардиология»
Belarus


M. V. Basalay
Республиканский научно-практический центр «Кардиология»
Belarus


A. G. Bulgak
Республиканский научно-практический центр «Кардиология»
Belarus


A. G. Mrochek
Республиканский научно-практический центр «Кардиология»
Belarus


References

1. MagiII P., Murphy Т., Bouchier-Hayes D. J., Mulhall К. J. Preconditioning and its clinical potential. IrJ Med Sci. 2009; 178 (2): 129-134.

2. Ludman A. J., Yellon D. М., Hausenloy D. J. Cardiac preconditioning for ischaemia: lost in translation. Dis Model Mech. 2010; 3(1-2):35-38.

3. Walsh S. R., Tang T. Y., Kullar P. et al. Ischaemic preconditioning during cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes in randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 34(5): 985-994.

4. Hausenloy D. J., Yellon D. M. Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Cardiovasc Res. 2008; 79; 377-386.

5. Lim S.Y., Yellon D.M., Hausenloy D.J. The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010(105):651-655.

6. Shimizu М., Tropak М., Diaz R. J. et al. Transient limb ischaemia remotely preconditions through a humoral mechanism acting directly on the myocardium: evidence suggesting cross-species protection. Clin Sci. 2009(117): 191-200.

7. King та J. G., Jr. Simard D., Voisine P., Rouleau J. R. Role of the autonomic nervous system in cardioprotection by remote preconditioning in isoflurane-anaesthetized dogs. Cardiovasc Res. 2011; 89 (2): 384-391.

8. Konstantinov I. E., Li J., Cheung М. М., et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning of the recipient reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury of the denervated donor heart via a KATP channel-dependent mechanism. Transplantation 2005 (79):1691-1695.

9. Jones W. K., Fan G. C., Liao S. et al. Peripheral nociception associated with surgical incision elicits remote nonischemic cardioprotection via neurogenic activation of protein kinase С signaling. Circulation 2009; 120(11):S1-S9.

10. Loukogeorgakis S. P., Panagiotidou A. Т., Broad head M. W. et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning provides early and late protection against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans: role of the autonomic nervous system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(3):450-456.

11. Steensrud Т., Li J., Dai X. et al. Pretreatment with the nitric oxide donor SNAP or nerve transection blocks humoral preconditioning by remote limb ischemia or intra-arterial adenosine. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010(299):H 1598-H1603.

12. Holzer P. Capsaicin: cellular targets, mechanisms of action, and selectivity for thin sensory neurons. Pharmacol Rev. 1991; 43(2):143-201.

13. Gourin A. V., Rudolph K., Korsak A. S. et al. Role of capsaicin-sensitive afferents in fever and cytokine responses during systemic and local inflammation in rats. Neuroimmunomodulation 2001; 9( 1): 13-22.

14. Ren X., Wang Y., Jones W. K. TNF-alpha is required for late ischemic preconditioning but not for remote preconditioning of trauma. J Surg Res. 2004; 121(1): 120-129.

15. Botker H. E., Kharbanda R., Schmidt M. R. et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized trial. Lancet 2010; 375(9716):727-734.

16. Braunwald E., Kloner R.A. Myocardial reperfusion: a double-edged sword? J Clin Invest. 1985;76(5): 1713-1719.

17. Piper H. М., Garcia-Dorado D., Ovize M. A fresh look at reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 1998; 38(2):291-300.

18. OvizeM., BaxterG. F.,DiLisa F. etal. Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? Cardiovasc Res. 2010; 87(3):406-423.

19. Tsang A., Hausenloy D. J., Yellon D. M. Myocardial postconditioning: reperfusion injury revisited. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 289(1):H2-H7.

20. Басалай М. В., Барсукевич В. Ч., Мрочек А. Г. и соавт. Кардиопротекторный эффект дистантного ишемического прекондиционирования на реперфузионные повреждения миокарда на модели острой коронарной недостаточности. Кардиология в Беларуси 2011; 2:37-44.


Review

For citations:


Barsukevich V.Ch., Basalay M.V., Bulgak A.G., Mrochek A.G. THE ROLE OF SENSITIVE C-FIBERS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOPROTECTIVE EFFECT OF REMOTE ISCHAEMIC PRECONDITIONING. Eurasian heart journal. 2012;(1):6-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2012-1-6-13

Views: 341


ISSN 2225-1685 (Print)
ISSN 2305-0748 (Online)