COMPARISON OF GENERAL CLINICAL DATA FROM TWO INDEPENDENT REGISTERS AMONG MALE SUBJECTS IN ONE AREA TASHKENT CITY

The register is an organized system for collecting information about patients with specific diseases. Functions of registers on acute coronary diseases allow using them to characterize therapeutic approaches and assess their quality. It is with the help of registers that help to identify the status and deficiencies in the management of patients at individual stages of specialized care, you can see the most optimal ways to improve the quality of treatment. Carrying out registers and estimation of their dynamics for today are poorly covered in the literature, and in this connection we conducted a comparative analysis of the database of two independent registers (in 2009 and 2015) in one of the districts of Tashkent (a total of 894 patients with acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction). The analysis revealed that the incidence of ACSAMI in the 2nd register among men younger than 40 years decreased, but the number of obese individuals increased. In the 2nd register, the number of men with HR> 90 beats/min decreased, but the mean values of blood pressure increased. Among men with ACS/ АMI, an increase in the level of triglycerides of blood was registered in the 2nd register, but the percentage of men with hypertriglyceridemia was less. In the 2nd register, the number of troponin determinations has increased, which indicates an increase in the coverage of laboratory studies. The results of the 2nd register on ACS/ АMI among males revealed a significant increase in the groups of drugs used in the treatment, not only those included in the basic therapy of IHD, but also the main ones in the treatment of ACS/ АMI, which indicates positive qualitative shifts in treatment acute cardiac pathology. Thus, the use of the population methodologies of the Registers allows the creation of a program for predicting the outcome of the disease, and also to improve the volume and quality of medical care, taking into account individual risk factors and the potential of their interrelationships

acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, male population, comparative analysis of two registers

1. Oxford Handbook of General Practice, Cardiology and vascular disease, United Kingdom, 4th edition, 2014; page 231-293:248-252.

2. Simoons M.L. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: challenges for the medical profession. Opening address of the 2002 Congress European Society of Cardiology (editorial). Eur. Heart J. 2003; 24: 8–12.

3. Martsevich S., Ginsburg ML, Kutishenko N.P. et al Study of LIS (Lyubertsy study of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction). Portrait of the sick. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2011; 10 (6): 89-93 [in Russian].

4. Ohman E.M., Bhatt D.L., Steg P.G., Goto S. et al. The REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry: an international, prospective, observational investigation in subjects at risk for atherothrombotic events-study design. Am Heart J 2006;151(4):786. e. 1–10.

5. Tang E.W., Wong C.K., Herbison P. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post-acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 2007;153(1): 29–35.

6. Kakkar A.K., Mueller I., Bassand J.P. et al. International longitudinal registry of patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: Global Anticoagulant Registryin the FIELD (GARFIELD). Am Heart J 2012;163(1):13–19.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Nov 20.

7. ACC/AHA 2007 Focused Update of the 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation, 2008; 117: 296–329.

8. Matusevich N.V. Monitoring of myocardial infarction (diagnostic combinations, prodromal period, behavioral characteristics) using the WHO program «Register of acute myocardial infarction» MONICA // Ter. archive. 2002. (9):9-12 [in Russian].

9. Reunanen A., Karjalainen J., Ristola P. et al. Heart rate and mortality. J Intern Med 2000; 247: 231–9.

10. Dyer A.R., Persky V., Stamler J. et al. Heart rate as a prognostic factor for coronary heart disease and mortality findings in three Chicago epidemiological studies. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 112: 736–49.

11. Filipovski J., Ducimetiere P., Safar M.E. Prognostic significance of exercise: blood pressure and heart rate in middle-aged men. Hypertension 1992; 20: 333–9.

12. Greenland P., Daviglus M.L., Dyer A.R. et al. Resting heart rate is a risk factor for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 853–62.

13. Mazur NA Sketches of clinical cardiologists. Moscow, 1999: 255p. [in Russian].

14. Parkhomenko AN, Lutai Ya.M., Danshan N. The Ukrainian register of acute myocardial infarction as a fragment of the European: characteristics of patients, organization of medical care and hospital therapy. UKR. MED. Chasopis, 2011; 1(81) I-II | www.umj.com.ua [in Russian].

15. Dawber T.R. et al. The Epidemiology of Coronary Heart Disease – The Framingham Enquiry. Ann. Intern. Med. – 1962. – Vol. S5. – P.265-271.

16. Multiple risk factor intervention trial: Risk factor changes and mortality results/Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group/JAMA. – 1982. – Vol.248. – P.1465-1477.

17. Sarwar N. et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospectine studies. Circulation 2007. Vol.115. P.450-458.