References

evrazkar

Евразийский Кардиологический Журнал

Eurasian heart journal

2225-16852305-0748

Евразийская ассоциация кардиологов

10.38109/2225-1685-2016-3-30-40

evrazkar-5920

Research Article

ОБЗОР

REVIEW

ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ НЕИНВАЗИВНЫХ МЕТОДОВ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ПРИ ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИИ ФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНОЙ ЗНАЧИМОСТИ СТЕНОЗОВ КОРОНАРНЫХ АРТЕРИЙ ПОГРАНИЧНОЙ СТЕПЕНИ ТЯЖЕСТИ У БОЛЬНЫХ С ХРОНИЧЕСКОЙ ИШЕМИЧЕСКОЙ БОЛЕЗНЬЮ СЕРДЦА

USING NON-INVASIVE METHODS FOR EVALUATING MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA IN ASSESSMENT OF THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF INTERMEDIATE CORONARY ARTERY STENOSES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Даренский

Д. И.

Darenskiy

D. I.

darensky.dmitrij@yandex.ru

Грамович

В. В.

Gramovich

V. V.

vgramovich@yandex.ru

Жарова

Е. А.

Zharova

E. A.

ekazharova@yandex.ru

Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс» Минздрава России, Институт клинической кардиологии им. А.Л. МясниковаРоссияRussian Cardiology Research and Production Complex, Ministry of HealthRussian Federation

2016

30092016

033040

2016

Даренский Д.И., Грамович В.В., Жарова Е.А.

Darenskiy D.I., Gramovich V.V., Zharova E.A.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.heartj.asia/jour/article/view/5920

В обзоре рассмотрены основные вопросы использования общепринятых в клинической практике неинвазивных методов верификации ишемии миокарда (стандартная проба с физической нагрузкой под контролем ЭКГ, стресс-эхокардиография, однофотонная эмиссионная компьютерная томография и магнитно-резонансная томография в сочетании со стресс-тестами) с целью определения функциональной значимости пограничных стенозов коронарных артерий (50-70% по диаметру просвета).

Key points of using non-invasive methods for evaluating myocardial ischemia (exercise electrocardiogram, stress echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging with stress-test) in clinical practice to determine the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses (50-70% of the vascular lumen) are discussed in the review.

неинвазивные методыИБСпограничные коронарные стенозыnon-invasive methodsIHDintermediate coronary stenoses

References1

Kern M.J., Lerman A., Bech J.W. et al. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006. Vol. 114, N12. P. 1321- 41.

Берштейн Л.Л., Катамадзе Н.О., Андреева А.Е. и др. Реваскуляризация или консервативная тактика при стабильной ишемической болезни сердца: современный взгляд на проблему. Кардиология 2014; 1:64-72.

Montalescot G., Sechtem U., Achenbach S. et al. ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. Heart. J. 2013. Vol. 34, N 38. P. 2949-3003.

Fihn S.D., Gardin J.M., Abrams J. et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012. Vol. 126, N 25. P. 354-471.

Windecker S., Kolh P., Alfonso F. et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur. Heart. J. 2014. Vol. 35, N 37. P. 2541-2619.

Levine G.N., Bates E.R., Blankenship J.C. et al. ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. JACC. 2011. Vol. 58, N 24. P. 44-122.

Pijls N.H., Fearon W.F., Tonino PA. et al. Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study. JACC. 2010. Vol. 56, N 3. P. 177-184.

Pijls N.H., Pim A. L., William F. Fearon et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Nonsignificant Stenosis. 5-Year Follow-Up of the DEFER Study. JACC. 2007. Vol. 49, N 21. P. 2105-2111.

De Bruyne B, Pijls N.H., Kalesan B. etal. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 367, N11. P. 991-1001.

Dattilo P.B., Prasad A., Honeycutt E. et al. Contemporary patterns of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound use among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC. 2012. Vol. 60, N 22. P. 2337-2339.

Hannan E.L., Cozzens K., Samadashvili Z. et al. Appropriateness of Coronary Revascularization for Patients Without Acute Coronary Syndromes. JACC. 2012. Vol. 59, N 21. P. 1870-1876.

Christou M.A., Siontis G.C., Katritsis D.G., Ioannidis J.P. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 99, N 4. P. 450-456.

Folland E.D., Vogel R.A., Hartigan P. et al. Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. Circulation. 1994. Vol. 89, N 5. P. 2005-2014.

Brueren B.R., ten Berg J.M., Suttorp M.J. et al. How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2002. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 73-76.

Topol E.J., Nissen S.E. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1995. Vol. 92, N 8. P. 2333-2342.

Beauman G.J., Vogel R.A. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. JACC. 1990. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 108-113.

Иванов В.А., Белякин С.А., Витязев С.П. и др. Алгоритм принятия решения при выявлении пограничных поражений коронарного русла. Диагностическая и интервенционная кардиология 2013; Том 7 №3:109-116. /

American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 8th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009. P. 10-22

Gianrossi R., Detrano R., Mulvihill D. et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation. 1989. Vol. 80, N1. P. 87-98.

Froelicher V.F., Lehmann K.G., Thomas R. et al. The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias: diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Health Services #016 (QUEXTA) Study Group. Quantitative Exercise Testing and Angiography. Ann. Intern. Med. 1998. Vol. 128, N 12, pt 1. P. 965-974.

Либби П., Боноу Р. О, Манн Д. Л, Зайпс Д. П. (ред.). Болезни сердца по Браунвальду. Том 1.8-е издание. М.: Рид Элсивер, 2010. С. 173-437.

Sicari R., Nihoyannopoulos P., Evangelista A. et al. Stress Echocardiography Expert Consensus Statement-Executive Summary: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2009. Vol. 30, N 3. P. 278-289.

Theroux P., Franklin D., Ross J.Jr., Lemper W.S. Regional myocardial function during acute coronary artery occlusion and its modification by pharmacological agents in the dog. Circ. Res. 1974. Vol. 35, N 6. P. 896-908.

Kerber R.E., Abboud F.M. Echocardiographic detection of regional myocardial infarction. An experimental study. Circulation. 1973. Vol. 47, N 5. P. 997-1005.

SugishitaY., Koseki S., Matsuada M. et al. Dissociation between regional myocardial dysfunction and ECG changes myocardial ischemia induced by exercise in patients with angina pectoris. Am. Heart. J. 1983. Vol. 106, N1, Pt 1. P. 1-8.

Елканова М.М., Шитов В.Н., Ботвина Ю.В. и др. Сравнение диагностических возможностей стресс-ЭхоКГ и нагрузочной ЭКГ у больных с различной тяжестью поражения коронарного русла. Кардиологический вестник 2015; 2:30-39.

Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G., Kuntz K.M., Douqlas P.S. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA. 1998. Vol. 280, N 10. P. 913-20.

Imran M.B., Palinkas A., Picano E. Head-to-head comparison of dipyridamole echocardiography and stress perfusion scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Comparison between stress echo and scintigraphy. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2003. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 23- 28.

Picano E., Molinaro S., Pasanisi E. The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound. 2008. Vol. 6, N 30. P. 1-9.

Picano E., Lattanzi F., Masini M. et al. Usefulness of a high-dose dipyridamole-echocardiography test for diagnosis of syndrome X. Am. J. Cardiol. 1987. Vol. 60, N 7. P. 508-512.

Kaski J.C., Rosano G.M., Collins P. et al. Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long term follow study. JACC. 1995. Vol. 25, N 4. P. 807-814.

Palinkas A., Toth E., Amyot R. et al. The value of ECG and echocardiography during stress-testing for identifying 46. systemic endothelial dysfunction and epicardial artery stenosis. Eur. Heart. J. 2002. Vol. 23, N 20. P. 1587-1595.

Camici P.G., Gistri R, Lorenzoni R. et al. Coronary reserve and 47. exercise ECG in patient with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1992. Vol. 86, N1. P. 179-186.

Ha J.W., Juracan E.M., Mahoney D.W. et al. Hypertensive response to exercise: a potential cause of a new wall motion abnormality in the absence of the coronary artery 48. disease. JACC. 2002. Vol. 39, N 2. P. 323-327.

Okei K., Shimizu M., Yoshio H. et al. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction during exercise and dobutamine stress in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. JACC. 2000. Vol. 36, N 3. P. 856-863. 49.

Miller D.D., Ruddy T.D., Zusman R.M. et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction response during exercise in asymptomatic systemic hypertension. Am. J. Cardiol. 1987. Vol. 59, N 5. P. 409413.

Schulman D.S., Tugoen J.F., Flores A.R. et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction response during supine and upright exercise in patient with systemic hypertension and 50. its relation to peak filling rate. Am. J. Cardiol. 1995. Vol. 76, N 1. P. 61-65.

Mairesse G.H., Marwick T.H., Arnese M. et al. Improved identification of coronary artery disease in patient with 51. left bundle branch block by use of dobutamine stress echocardiography and comparison with myocardial perfusion tomography. Am. J. Cardiol. 1995. Vol. 76, N 5. P. 321-325.

Geleijnse M.L., Vigna C., Kasprzak J.D. et al. Usefulness and limitations of dobutamine stress echocardiography for 52. the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patient with left bundle branch block. Eur. Heart J. 2000. Vol. 21, N 20. P. 1666-1673.

Yuda S., Khoury V., Marwick T. Influence of wall stress and 53. left ventricular geometry on the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. JACC. 2002. Vol. 40, N 7. P. 1311-1319.

Wahi S., Marwick T.H. Aortic regurgitation reduces the 54. accuracy of exercise echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 1999. Vol. 12, N 11. P. 967-973.

Pellikka P.A., Naguch S.F., Elhendy A.A. et al. American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations for Performance, Interpretation, and Application of Stress 55. Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2007. Vol. 20, N 9. P. 1021-1041.

Elhendy A., OLeary E.L., Xie F. et al: Comparative accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast perfusion 56. imaging and wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. JACC. 2004. Vol. 44, N 11. P. 2185-2191.

Rigo F., Sicari R., Gherardi S. et al. Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in medically treated patients with 57. left anterior descending coronary disease with stenosis 51% to 75% in diameter. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 100, N 10. P. 1527-1531. 58.

Nagel E., Lehmkuhl H.B., Bocksch W. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. 59. Circulation. 1999. Vol. 99, N 6. P. 763-770.

Marwick T.H., Nemec J.J., Pashkow F.J. et al. Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting. JACC. 1992. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 74-81

Rieber J., Jung P., Erhard I. et al. Comparison of pressure measurement, dobutamine contrast stress echocardiography and SPECT for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses. The COMPRESS trial. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 2004. Vol. 6, N 3-4. P. 142-147

Ikonomidis I., Holmes E., Narbulvod H. et al. Left ventricular wall motion assessment and endocardial border delineation after intravenous injection of InfosonTM during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Coron. Artery. Dis. 1988. Vol. 9, N 9. P. 567-576

Jung P.H., Rieber J., Stork S. et al. Effect of contrast application on interpretability and diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: comparison with myocardial fractional flow reserve. Eur. Heart J. 2008. Vol. 29, N 20. P. 2536-2543

Wei K., Ragosta M., Thorpe J. et al. Noninvasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation. 2001. Vol. 103, N 21. P. 2560-2565

Masugata H., Laffite S., Peters B. et al. Comparison of real-time and intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography for quantification of coronary stenosis severity and transmural perfusion gradient. Circulation. 2001. Vol. 104, N 13. P. 1550-1556

Moir S., Haluska BA, Jenkins C. et al. Incremental benefit of myocardial contrast to combine dipyridamole-exercise stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2004. Vol. 110, N 9. P. 1108-1113

Gaibazzi N., Rigo F, Squeri A. et al. Incremental value of contrast myocardial perfusion to detect intermediate versus severe coronary artery stenosis during stress-echocardiography. Cardiovascular Ultrasound. 2010. Vol. 8. P. 16

Ahmad M., Xie T., McCulloch M. et al. Real-time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography in assessment stress echocardiography in assessment of ischemia: comparison with two-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography. JAMM. 2001. Vol. 37, N 5. P. 1303-9

Johri A.M., Chitty D.W., Hua L. et al. Assessment of image quality in real time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography: an integrated 2D/3D approach. Echocardiography. 2015. Vol. 32, N 3. P. 496-507

Aggeli C., Felekos I., Roussakis G. et al. Value of realtime three-dimensional adenosine stress contrast echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2011. Vol. 12, N 9. P. 648-55

Marckwick T.H. Measurement of strain rate by echocardiography: Ready for prime time? JACC. 2004. Vol. 47, N 7. P. 1313-1327

illis G.S., Oh J.K., Mahoney D.W. et al. Akinesia becoming dyskinesia after exercise testing: Prevalence and relationship to clinical outcome. JACC. 2003. Vol. 43, N 4. P. 599-605

Agarwal R., Gosain P., Kirkpatrick J.N. et al. Tissue Doppler imaging for diagnosis of coronary artery disease a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 2012. Vol. 10. P. 47-56.

Giesler T., Lamprecht S., Voigt J.U. et al. Long term follow up after deferral of revascularization in patients with intermediate coronary stenoses and negative dobutamine stress echocardiography. Heart. 2002. Vol. 88, N 6. P. 645-646.

Hendel R.C., Berman D.S., Di Carli M.F. et al. ACCF/ASNC/ ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Assocication, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians. JACC. 2009. Vol. 53, N 23. P. 2201-2229.

Сергиенко В.Б., Аншелес АА. Томографические методы в оценке перфузии миокарда. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2010. 3:10-14.

Сергиенко В.Б., Аншелес А.А. Молекулярные изображения в оценке атеросклероза и перфузии миокарда. Кардиологический вестник. 2010. 2: 76-82

Аншелес А.А., Сергиенко В.Б. Томографические методы диагностики при оценке перфузии миокарда у больных с ишемической болезнью сердца. Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2011. 3:74-79

Сергиенко В.Б. Однофотонная эмиссионная компьютерная томография. Опыт клинического применения. Дисс. докт. мед. наук. М. 1984

Verberne H.J., Acampa W., Anagnostopoulos C. et al. EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. Eur. J. Nucl Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015. Vol. 42, N 12. P. 1929-1940.

Аншелес А.А. Особенности интерпретации перфузи-онной однофотонной эмиссионной компьютерной томографии миокарда с компьютерно-томографической коррекцией поглощения. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2014.2:5-20.

Сергиенко В.Б., Аншелес АА., Шульгин Д.Н. и др. Методические рекомендации: перфузионная сцинтиграфия и ОЭКТ миокарда. Кардиологический вестник. 2015. 2: 6-21

Germano G., Kavanagh P.B., Waechter P., et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: technical principles and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2000. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 712-719.

Hachamovitch R., Hayes S.W., Friedman J.D. et al. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003. Vol. 107, N 23. P. 2900-2907.

Shaw L.J., Berman D.S., Maron D.J., et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008. Vol. 117, N10. P. 1283-1291.

Hesse B., Lindhardt T.B., Acampa W. et al. EANM/ESC guidelines for radionuclide imaging of cardiac function. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2008. Vol. 35, N 4. P. 851-855.

Hesse B., Tagil K., Cuocolo A. et al. EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2005. Vol. 32, N 7. P. 855-897.

McLaughlin M.G., Dannies P.G. Transient ischemic dilatation: A powerful diagnostic and prognosis finding of stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2002. Vol. 9, N 6. P. 663-667

Morise A.P., Diamond G.A. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography in biased and unbiased populations of men and women. Am. Heart J. 1995. Vol. 130, N 4. P. 741-747.

Heijenbrok-Kal M.H., Fleischmann K.E., Hunink M.G. Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am. Heart. J. 2007. Vol. 154, N 3. P. 415-423.

Mc Ardle B.A., Dowsley T.F., deKemp R.A. et al. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC. 2012. Vol. 60, N 18. P. 1828-1837.

de Jong M.C., Genders T.S., van Geuns R.J. et al. Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2012. Vol. 22, N 9. P. 1881-1895.

Higgins J.P., Williams G., Nagel J.S., Higgins J.A. Left bundle-branch block artifact on single photon emission computed tomography with technetium Tc 99m (Tc-99m) agents: mechanisms and a method to decrease false-positive interpretations. Am. Heart J. 2006. Vol. 152, N 4. P. 619-626.

Hacker M., Rieber J., Schmid R. et al. Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2005. Vol. 12, N 6. P. 645-654.

Sahiner I., Akdemir U.O., Kocaman S.A. et al. Quantitative evaluation improves specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT in the assessment of functionally significant intermediate coronary artery stenoses: a comparative study with fractional flow reserve measurements. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2013. Vol. 27, N 2. P. 132-139.

Соломяный В.В., Сергиенко И.В., Самко А.Н. Количественная оценка гемодинамической значимости пограничных коронарных стенозов коронарных артерий методом однофотонной эмиссионной компьютерной томографии миокарда с коррекцией поглощения излучения в сравнении с фракционным резервом кровотока. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии 2014; 6:39-46

Forster S., Rieber J., Ubleis C. et al. Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2010. Vol. 26, N 2. P. 203-213.

Erhard I., Rieber J., Jung P. et al. The validation of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary multivessel disease: a comparison with SPECTand contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography. Z. Kardiol. 2005. Vol. 94, N 5. P. 321-327.

Pakkal M., Raj V., McCann G.P. Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment. Br. J. Radiol. 2011. Vol. 84. P. 280-295.

Heydari B., Jerosch-Herold M., Kwong R.Y. Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2011. Vol. 54, N 3. P. 191-203.

Dastidar A.G., Rodrigues J.C., Baritussio A., Bucciarelli-Ducci C. MRI in the assessment of ischaemic heart disease. Heart. 2016. Vol. 102, N 3. P. 239-252.

Грамович В.В., Синицын В.Е., Гордин М.П., Стукалова О.В., Устюжанин Д.В., Терновой С.К. Количественная оценка перфузии миокарда с помощью контрастной магнитно-резонансной томографии: методические аспекты. Вестник рентгенол. и радиол. 2003; 6:45-55.

Грамович В.В., Синицын В.Е., Гордин М.П., Стукалова О.В., Самко А.Н., Устюжанин Д.В., Терновой С.К. Количественная оценка перфузии миокарда с помощью магнитно-резонансной томографии у больных хронической ишемической болезнью сердца: клиническое применение. Кардиология 2004; 8:4-12

Strach K., Meyer C., Schild H., Sommer T. Cardiac stress MR imaging with dobutamine. Eur. Radiol. 2006. Vol. 16, N 12. P. 2728-2738.

Nandalur K.R., Dwamena B.A., Choudhri A.F. et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JACC. 2007. Vol. 50, N 14. P. 1343-1353.

Hamon M., Fau G., Nee G. et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2010. Vol. 12, N 29. P. 1-10.

Schwitter J., Wacker C.M., van Rossum A.C. et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur. Heart J. 2008. Vol. 29, 4. P. 480-489.

Schwitter J., Wacker C.M., Wilke N. et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. Eur. Heart J. 2013. Vol. 34, N 10. P. 775-781.

Greenwood J.P., Maredia N., Younger J.F. et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012 Vol. 379,N 9814. P. 453-460.

Thom H., West N.E., Hughes V. et al. Cost-effectiveness of initial stress cardiovascular MR, stress SPECT or stress echocardiography as a gate-keeper test, compared with upfront invasive coronary angiography in the investigation and management of patients with stable chest pain: midterm outcomes from the CECaT randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014. Vol. 4, N 2. P. 1-12.

Desai R.R., Jha S. Diagnostic performance of cardiac stress perfusion MRI in the detection of coronary artery disease using fractional flow reserve as the reference standard: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2013. Vol. 201, N 2. P. 245-252.

100

Sommer T., Hofer U., Omran H., Schild H. Stress cine MRI for detection of coronary artery disease. Rofo. 2002. Vol. 174, N 5. P. 605-613.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.